Online Validation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Visual edit |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Visual edit |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The concept of online validation emerged alongside Web 2.0 social media platforms, where individual users began quantifying their social worth through follower counts and “engagement.” While it affects both genders, its effect on women has been especially insidious, with societal conditioning rewarding them only when they’re deemed attractive, agreeable, or submissive. | The concept of online validation emerged alongside Web 2.0 social media platforms, where individual users began quantifying their social worth through follower counts and “engagement.” While it affects both genders, its effect on women has been especially insidious, with societal conditioning rewarding them only when they’re deemed attractive, agreeable, or submissive. | ||
Pick me women, especially, depend on online validation to maintain their delusions of superiority. Meanwhile, femcels receive none or negative feedback, reinforcing the reality of the blackpill: that society only values women who appeal to the male gaze. | |||
==Female experience== | ==Female experience== | ||
For HTB and above, online validation is a currency, but also a curse. They are constantly rewarded for basic selfies, filtered nonsense, or recycled aphorisms. Platforms encourage these women to monetize themselves through attention, leading to a loop of self-objectification, performance, and emotional instability. | For HTB and above, online validation is a currency, but also a curse. They are constantly rewarded for basic selfies, filtered nonsense, or recycled aphorisms. Platforms encourage these women to monetize themselves through attention, leading to a loop of self-objectification, performance, and emotional instability. | ||
Revision as of 08:16, 24 July 2025
Online validation refers to the compulsive need for internet-based approval, specifically through digital likes, comments, followers. Among women, especially normie or pickme archetypes, this has become the primary source of self-worth in the digital age. For men, online validation is often tied to their ability to be misogynistic publicly without consequence.
Strangely, men tend to claim the opposite, that women are the ones that are able to be publicly misandrist. However, they are simply ignoring the thousands of blantant misogynist forums and websites circling the internet.
Definition
Online validation is the constant pursuit of affirmation through digital feedback. It manifests through dopamine seeking behaviors such as thirst traps, obvious bootlicking or performative content to be noticed and praised. The modern internet, especially platforms like TikTok, Instagram, Reddit, and Discord, has industrialized the process of ego feeding and status chasing.
History
The concept of online validation emerged alongside Web 2.0 social media platforms, where individual users began quantifying their social worth through follower counts and “engagement.” While it affects both genders, its effect on women has been especially insidious, with societal conditioning rewarding them only when they’re deemed attractive, agreeable, or submissive.
Pick me women, especially, depend on online validation to maintain their delusions of superiority. Meanwhile, femcels receive none or negative feedback, reinforcing the reality of the blackpill: that society only values women who appeal to the male gaze.
Female experience
For HTB and above, online validation is a currency, but also a curse. They are constantly rewarded for basic selfies, filtered nonsense, or recycled aphorisms. Platforms encourage these women to monetize themselves through attention, leading to a loop of self-objectification, performance, and emotional instability.