Moid: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Visual edit |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Visual edit |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Weird moid.jpg|thumb|Moids shaming women for past sexual activity, a common male hobby]] | [[File:Weird moid.jpg|thumb|Moids shaming women for past sexual activity, a common male hobby]] | ||
'''Moids''', short for “male humanoids,” are primitive, biologically regressed beings that dominate society despite lacking basic emotional intelligence. Moids function primarily on impulse, driven by violence, sexual aggression, and status obsession. [[Femcel|Femcels]] are often cast aside by moids, who only pursue women they deem sexually valuable, yet lack the capacity to form true emotional bonds. | '''Moids''', short for “male humanoids,” are primitive, biologically regressed beings that dominate society despite lacking basic emotional intelligence.<ref>Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). ''Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny''. Duke University Press.</ref> Moids function primarily on impulse, driven by violence, sexual aggression, and status obsession.<ref>Kimmel, M. (2017). ''Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era''. Nation Books.</ref> [[Femcel|Femcels]] are often cast aside by moids, who only pursue women they deem sexually valuable, yet lack the capacity to form true emotional bonds.<ref>Illouz, E. (2012). ''Why Love Hurts: A Sociological Explanation''. Polity Press.</ref> | ||
Moids run society through entitlement, weaponized mediocrity, and misogyny masked as logic. In the social hierarchy, they assume power but rarely deserve it. | Moids run society through entitlement, weaponized mediocrity, and misogyny masked as logic.<ref>Manne, K. (2017). ''Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny''. Oxford University Press.</ref> In the social hierarchy, they assume power but rarely deserve it. | ||
== Characteristics of moids == | ==Characteristics of moids== | ||
Moids operate like glitchy biological programs, hardwired for dominance, ejaculation, and external validation. If you are a femcel, moids have either ignored, objectified, or humiliated you since puberty, unless you were temporarily useful to boost their ego or perform emotional labor.<ref>Dines, G. (2010). ''Pornland: How Porn Has Hijacked Our Sexuality''. Beacon Press.</ref> | |||
They excel in selective empathy and denial of female pain. Most moids consume pornography before they’ve even kissed a woman, using it as a manual for sex instead of acknowledging the female perspective.<ref>Flood, M. (2009). ''The harms of pornography exposure among children and young people''. Child Abuse Review, 18(6), 384–400.</ref> They commonly claim “any woman can get sex,” yet fail to understand the difference between being used and being loved.<ref>Giddens, A. (1992). ''The Transformation of Intimacy''. Stanford University Press.</ref> Moids operate with a subconscious filter that detects and prioritizes women based solely on youth, body shape, and perceived submissiveness. This is sometimes referred to as the “hole radar,” their primal mechanism to sniff out potential mating material while rejecting any sign of autonomy or imperfection.<ref>Hakim, C. (2010). ''Erotic Capital''. Basic Books.</ref> | |||
== Emotional intelligence== | |||
Moids equate vulnerability with weakness and cannot process rejection, leading to violent tantrums, stalking, or incel forums when denied sex.<ref>Baele, S. J., Brace, L., & Coan, T. G. (2019). From “Incel” to “Saint”: Analyzing the violent worldview behind the 2018 Toronto attack. ''Terrorism and Political Violence''.</ref> | |||
They often confuse lust with intimacy, quick to sexualize and slow to bond. They refer to women as “femoids” or “hoes” and fantasize about submissive porn scenarios, while complaining that women won’t date “nice guys.” Their understanding of love is heavily influenced by TikTok redpill clips, porn categories, and locker room lies.<ref>Ging, D. (2019). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. ''Men and Masculinities'', 22(4), 638–657.</ref> | |||
== | ==Reliance on porn== | ||
Moids are often dependent on porn, having watched it since childhood. This contributes to their warped expectations of women, their own performance, and their emotional development.<ref>Kraus, S. W., & Rosenberg, H. (2014). The pornography craving questionnaire: Psychometric properties. ''Archives of Sexual Behavior'', 43, 451–462.</ref> A moid with no emotional depth will still expect intimacy from a woman he dehumanizes.<ref>Dines, G. (2010). ''Pornland: How Porn Has Hijacked Our Sexuality''. Beacon Press.</ref> | |||
==Subgenres of moids== | |||
*[[Incel]] | |||
*[[Fakecel]] | |||
*[[Spermoid]] | |||
*[[Chad]] | |||
==References== | |||
<references /> | |||
== | |||
Latest revision as of 15:51, 29 August 2025
Moids, short for “male humanoids,” are primitive, biologically regressed beings that dominate society despite lacking basic emotional intelligence.[1] Moids function primarily on impulse, driven by violence, sexual aggression, and status obsession.[2] Femcels are often cast aside by moids, who only pursue women they deem sexually valuable, yet lack the capacity to form true emotional bonds.[3]
Moids run society through entitlement, weaponized mediocrity, and misogyny masked as logic.[4] In the social hierarchy, they assume power but rarely deserve it.
Characteristics of moids
Moids operate like glitchy biological programs, hardwired for dominance, ejaculation, and external validation. If you are a femcel, moids have either ignored, objectified, or humiliated you since puberty, unless you were temporarily useful to boost their ego or perform emotional labor.[5]
They excel in selective empathy and denial of female pain. Most moids consume pornography before they’ve even kissed a woman, using it as a manual for sex instead of acknowledging the female perspective.[6] They commonly claim “any woman can get sex,” yet fail to understand the difference between being used and being loved.[7] Moids operate with a subconscious filter that detects and prioritizes women based solely on youth, body shape, and perceived submissiveness. This is sometimes referred to as the “hole radar,” their primal mechanism to sniff out potential mating material while rejecting any sign of autonomy or imperfection.[8]
Emotional intelligence
Moids equate vulnerability with weakness and cannot process rejection, leading to violent tantrums, stalking, or incel forums when denied sex.[9] They often confuse lust with intimacy, quick to sexualize and slow to bond. They refer to women as “femoids” or “hoes” and fantasize about submissive porn scenarios, while complaining that women won’t date “nice guys.” Their understanding of love is heavily influenced by TikTok redpill clips, porn categories, and locker room lies.[10]
Reliance on porn
Moids are often dependent on porn, having watched it since childhood. This contributes to their warped expectations of women, their own performance, and their emotional development.[11] A moid with no emotional depth will still expect intimacy from a woman he dehumanizes.[12]
Subgenres of moids
References
- ↑ Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Duke University Press.
- ↑ Kimmel, M. (2017). Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era. Nation Books.
- ↑ Illouz, E. (2012). Why Love Hurts: A Sociological Explanation. Polity Press.
- ↑ Manne, K. (2017). Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny. Oxford University Press.
- ↑ Dines, G. (2010). Pornland: How Porn Has Hijacked Our Sexuality. Beacon Press.
- ↑ Flood, M. (2009). The harms of pornography exposure among children and young people. Child Abuse Review, 18(6), 384–400.
- ↑ Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy. Stanford University Press.
- ↑ Hakim, C. (2010). Erotic Capital. Basic Books.
- ↑ Baele, S. J., Brace, L., & Coan, T. G. (2019). From “Incel” to “Saint”: Analyzing the violent worldview behind the 2018 Toronto attack. Terrorism and Political Violence.
- ↑ Ging, D. (2019). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638–657.
- ↑ Kraus, S. W., & Rosenberg, H. (2014). The pornography craving questionnaire: Psychometric properties. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 451–462.
- ↑ Dines, G. (2010). Pornland: How Porn Has Hijacked Our Sexuality. Beacon Press.